Roads and Highways

Critical Infrastructure: The United States and GPS

So, President Obama wants to spend some money on infrastructure, eh? Well, here’s an idea: send some of it GPS’s way.

Infrastructure isn’t just concrete and rebar. We can also build highways to the stars and — pardon the clichés — bridges to the future rather than bridges to nowhere.

And talk about bang for the buck. The billion dollars or so that the United States spends on GPS each year produces many tens of billions of dollars in products and services.

So, President Obama wants to spend some money on infrastructure, eh? Well, here’s an idea: send some of it GPS’s way.

Infrastructure isn’t just concrete and rebar. We can also build highways to the stars and — pardon the clichés — bridges to the future rather than bridges to nowhere.

And talk about bang for the buck. The billion dollars or so that the United States spends on GPS each year produces many tens of billions of dollars in products and services.

Of course, a big chunk of that GPS market is outside of this country. But after our recent lamentable contribution to global financial troubles, perhaps its time to remind the world about the unprecedented U.S. generosity in creating an entirely new public utility and making it available everywhere.

Not only that, but U.S. policy forced other GNSS providers to be generous, too. As the would-be Galileo public-private partnership discovered, you can’t compete with free.

Anyway, back to Obama and infrastructure.

The Global Positioning System has many unusual, novel, perhaps even unique features. But the one that relates to the current topic is that GPS is both a critical infrastructure in itself — notably its ground control and space segments and the pervasive, strategic installation of high-performance receivers  — and a contributor to other critical infrastructures, such as communications networks or transportation.

That should earn GPS double the attention, if not twice the budget.

But there’s more. GPS not only allows us to do things that we couldn’t do before; it allows us to do them more efficiently — greater productivity at less cost, whether surveying forest boundaries or guiding a thousand airplanes at once.

And though those efficiencies may reduce the job opportunities at individual enterprises, they stimulate a far greater amount of job creation overall — design and engineering, manufacturing, professional fieldwork — most of it high-skilled and higher-paying than the positions that were lost.

The United States really hasn’t had an industrial policy since just before and during World War II, when the Roosevelt administration converted much of the nation’s jobless into public employees (Works Progress Administration, Civilian Conservation Corps), its manufacturing sector into an armament assembly line, and gasoline and foodstuffs into ration coupons.

After that, we saw occasional, isolated initiatives — the interstate highway system, the lunar missions of the 1960s, SEMATECH — large-scale infrastructure and technology programs that could have served as potential components of an industrial policy, if one had existed.

GPS can help thread the new infrastructure efforts together, and expand the role that it already plays.  Many commercial GPS manufacturers are looking forward to the opportunities that building or restoring highways, bridges, and (imagine!) maybe even railroads will bring.

But the United States is still running the GPS program as though we had all the time in the world. Well, no offense to those atomic clocks on board the GPS satellites (another first of its kind), but the world is quickly catching up with us in matters of GNSS. And, if we take a close look at the world’s four GNSS program schedules, over the next few years just about every other GNSS system is going to pass GPS by in terms of signal availability, modernity, and diversity.

The United States risks seeing its GPS brand decline amid the growing choices in the GNSS marketplace.

It’s time that the GPS leadership, civil and military, revisited its prevailing philosophy and began launching for scheduled capability, rather than as needed to sustain an aging constellation.

And, while they’re at it, they should take another look at the size of the constellation. Every other GNSS system is committed to a true 30 satellite/30 slot configuration. If the advent of the biggest infrastructure investment in American history isn’t the right time to do the same with GPS, when is?

As American poet Edwin Markham asked on behalf of the man with the hoe gazing at the ground, “Give back the upward looking and the light/ Rebuild in it the music and the dream”

By
November 24, 2008

GPS Constellation Simulator

GPS Creations offers the GPS SIM14, an L1/L2 GPS constellation simulator available in either C/A code–only or C/A-code and P-code configurations, which can simulate up to 14 satellites simultaneously. The simulator can be integrated with a multi-function feature card (MFI/O) to provide extended capabilities such as IMU, automotive, and factory test & timing. An adjustable RF power output has a dynamic range of 66 dB.

Read More >

By Glen Gibbons

CeBIT Hanover 2009

CeBIT is the world’s largest information and communications technology exhibition, concentrating on the business-to-business, not the consumer, market.

The massive German trade fair at the Hannover Exhibition Center includes a dedicated Telematics and Navigation section in Halls 14 and 15.

It features indoor GPS reception for real time navigation and positioning at exhibitors’ booths.

A joint exhibit area is prominently located in the T & N section for the Galileo satellite navigation community

Read More >

By Inside GNSS
[uam_ad id="183541"]
October 19, 2008

Navigation World Forum at SYSTEMS 2008

For the first time, the navigation industry will engage in discussions and make presentations on the first two days of the SYSTEMS, the ICT trade show, in a separate conference forum.

The winners of the European Satellite Navigation Competition will present their ideas at this event.

It will be held directly adjacent to the Navigation World Area in Hall B1 of the New Munich Trade Fair Center in Munich, Germany.

Read More >

By Inside GNSS
July 29, 2008

NXP/STMicroelectronics JV Launches

ST-NXP Wireless, a new company bringing together key wireless operations of STMicroelectronics and NXP, will begin operations August 2 following completion of a deal announced earlier this year.

Owning thousands of communication and multimedia patents, the new joint venture will bring key technologies for UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System) and for the emerging TD-SCDMA standard, as well as other cellular, multimedia and connectivity capabilities — including WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS, FM radio, USB, and UWB (ultra-wideband).

Read More >

By Glen Gibbons
[uam_ad id="183541"]
April 28, 2008

Telematics Detroit 2008

 SEE TELEMATICS DETROIT 2009!

Conference and exhibition on automotive, mobile and web-based telematics takes place in The Rock Financial Showplace in Novi, Michigan, USA. It features a Navigation and Location miniconference on May 21 and 22 focusing on new developments and delivery strategies for navigation and location based strategies across industries.

Read More >

By Inside GNSS
April 8, 2008

GNSS on the Go–Sensitivity and Performance in Receiver Design

Position tracking is no longer limited to fixed automotive applications or expensive handheld tracking systems.

Consumer demand combined with recent innovations in GNSS technology is making position tracking a must-have feature in a wide range of cost-sensitive applications, including cellular handsets, personal navigation systems, and other consumer electronic devices.

Position tracking is no longer limited to fixed automotive applications or expensive handheld tracking systems.

Consumer demand combined with recent innovations in GNSS technology is making position tracking a must-have feature in a wide range of cost-sensitive applications, including cellular handsets, personal navigation systems, and other consumer electronic devices.

Developing a GNSS position tracking subsystem for consumer electronic devices can appear to be a daunting challenge. Developers must not only keep down costs while maximizing performance and accuracy, they have to do so using RF technology with which they may have little experience.

Sensitivity is the key to accuracy of a GNSS receiver. The signals that a GNSS receiver tries to detect and process are buried in noise; therefore, the task of maintaining signal integrity is a key challenge for many developers.

This article describes how becoming familiar with a few key aspects of RF design can help developers avoid many of the seemingly arbitrary design decisions that can cause position tracking functionality to fail to achieve sufficient accuracy. It also highlights how developers can exploit software-based GNSS baseband architectures to reduce RF subsystem complexity while further increasing sensitivity and positioning accuracy. . .

Conclusion
. . . By understanding that RF sensitivity is the key to accuracy, developers can avoid common design pitfalls that delay time to market and increase system cost.

Additionally, by using the proper components and taking advantage of next-generation innovations such as software-based baseband processing, developers can achieve the best sensitivity and accuracy without having to become RF experts themselves.

(For the complete article, including figures, charts, and images, please download the PDF version at the link above.)
By
January 25, 2008

Fastrax Launches Two New OEM GPS Units

IT321

Fastrax Ltd. has launched two new GPS OEM receivers, including one with an integrated chip antenna, aimed at designers of mass-market automotive and portable devices.

The Fastrax UC322 incorporates an on-board chip antenna (five millimeters thick) designed to reduce the size from that of typical patch antennas and large separate ground planes, according to the company. Instead, the end device’s printed circuit board functions as part of the antenna.

Read More >

By Glen Gibbons
January 3, 2008

China GNSS 101

Late last year, I attended China’s only government-sanctioned international conference on GNSS and visited a number of local companies. I came to one conclusion: The world of GNSS is about to change, and China will have a lot to do with that.

Consider this: China has launched its own GNSS system, Compass/Beidou. It has liberalized policies on GNSS receivers and navigable digital maps. It is already one of the world’s largest economies with enormous capital reserves and steadily-growing disposable income in the hands of millions of citizens.

Late last year, I attended China’s only government-sanctioned international conference on GNSS and visited a number of local companies. I came to one conclusion: The world of GNSS is about to change, and China will have a lot to do with that.

Consider this: China has launched its own GNSS system, Compass/Beidou. It has liberalized policies on GNSS receivers and navigable digital maps. It is already one of the world’s largest economies with enormous capital reserves and steadily-growing disposable income in the hands of millions of citizens.

As a GNSS player, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) arouses interest and concern on at least four levels: as a service provider (compatible or incompatible?), as an equipment manufacturer (competitor or partner?), as a product designer and technology distributor (re-engineering or innovation?), and as an enormous market of largely untapped potential (closed or open?).

In their own fashion, of course, every other GNSS provider brings the same set of questions and, like China, a distinct way of answering them. The real questions are what lessons has China learned from the world’s 30-year experience with GNSS and how will it apply those lessons to the nation’s emerging role of GNSS provider, designer, manufacturer, and marketplace.

One measure of that can be taken from increasingly public, though still carefully scripted statements on the subject from Chinese public officials and industry leaders.

NaviForum: Beidou’s Debut
The Shanghai Navigation Forum (NaviForum) bills itself as the only international GNSS exhibition and conference officially approved by the Chinese government, which is also deeply involved with the organization of the event.

(Sponsors included the Department of High & New Technology Development and Industrialization, Ministry of Science & Technology (MOST); Department of Map Management, State Bureau of Surveying & Mapping (SBSM); and the Science & Technology Commission of the, Shanghai Municipal People’s Government.)

Its fourth annual staging in December 2007 drew more than 700 attendees, with 29 percent coming from outside China, according to conference organizers. And it was, in many respects, a coming out party for Compass, which is also widely known by its Chinese pinyin (alphabetized) name, Beidou.

As with GPS and Russia’s GLONASS systems, Compass began as a military program operated by China’s defense mapping agency and, as with those other two GNSSes, will continue to have a military component. Several geostationary satellites were launched beginning in 2000, broadcasting on a center frequency of 2491.75 MHz in a small slice of spectrum allocated for radiodetermination/mobile satellite.

Until late in 2006, it appeared that Compass/Beidou would remain a regional system, augmenting full-fledged GNSSes. A 2003 agreement committed China to investing €200 million ($290 million) in cooperative development of the European Union’s Galileo system.

In October 2006, however, China announced that it would build a full-fledged GNSS system that would transmit signals in the L1 band where GPS and Galileo military and public safety services are located. Then, last April 14 China launched a middle-earth orbiting (MEO) satellite and quickly began broadcasting signals.

The Compass signals were soon analyzed by researchers at Stanford University and Belgian GNSS receiver manufacturer Septentrio, who published articles in the July/August 2007 issue of Inside GNSS describing their findings.

Subsequently, in a break with a previously restrained public posture on the subject, several representatives from the China Satellite Navigation Engineering Center described the program in some detail at NaviForum 2007. In another session, “New Positioning System,” European and Chinese public and industry panelists focused on Compass. And throughout the conference, Chinese speakers referred repeatedly and favorably to the domestic GNSS system.

Something Old, Something New
Much of the information revealed in the Shanghai meeting merely confirmed what had already been published by outside researchers: L-band signals centered at 1561.098 MHz ± 2.046 MHz (Beidou 1 or B1, overlaying the Galileo E2 band and part of the GPS L1) and 1589.742 MHz (B1-2 on Galileo E1 and the upper portion of GPS L1); 1207.14 MHz ±12 MHz (B2, E5b), and 1268.52 ±12 MHz (B3, on the lower portion of E6).

B1/B1-2 signals would use quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and binary offset carrier (BOC) modulations similar to those employed by GPS and Galileo on those frequencies, according to Yang Qiangwen, senior engineer, China Satellite Navigation Project Center (CSNPC, also sometimes referred to as the engineering center) in the Beijing region. The signals will have a pseudorandom noise (PRN) code chipping rate of 2.046 Mcps and a minimum received power level of -163 dBW.

Several of the speakers, however, also provided further insight into Compass and China’s ambitious plans for the system. Ran Chengqi, the CSNPC deputy director speaking in place of the center’s director, Yang Changfeng, told the NaviForum audience that open services would be operated at L1 and L5.

He also emphasized the need for compatibility and interoperability with other GNSS systems, saying, “China will work with the other GNSS providers under UN International Committee on GNSS (ICG) rules.”

“Beidou is a huge investment,” Ran said. “We need to be very careful in its implementation and look at the risks in the market. Our goal is a long-term commitment to users.

He underlined the system’s “strategic role,” adding, “although Beidou has made a fast start, we still need to commit our resources to make sure. We need more open industrial policies,” alluding to the promised publication of a public Interface Control Document (ICD) that would specify Compass’s technical parameters so that receiver manufacturers could build user equipment confidently.

“We have to build up [Compass/Beidou] awareness and our own brand in the world,” Ran concluded. “An open, prosperous, and strong China will develop based on an open, strong, and healthy navigation system.”

In a plenary session speech, Liao Xiao-han, deputy director of High & New Technology Development and Industry, Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), said, “After completion of Compass, we believe it will be the major supplier of positioning, navigation, and timing [PNT] in China and also a significant supplier of PNT in the world.”

Liao emphasized the need to make Compass “compatible and interoperable with GPS and Galileo” by working to share common frequencies and avoid interference on limited GNSS bandwidth.

Meanwhile, he added, “We are working with Galileo to create synergy,” he said, “We want to expand the PNT footprint.”

According to several speakers, Beidou will be providing a regional service over the east Asia region by 2009 and a global service later at an indeterminate date. Beidou’s open services will be offered without “entrance or authorization fees.”

In the New Positioning System session, Yang reported that the CSNPC would provide an open and free ICD on its website “in the very near future,” admitting, however, that the website was still under development. Compass operators have a “very detailed plan for future beyond 2009,” which would be released along with a launch schedule – also “in the very near future,” he said.

In tests of Beidou’s signals conducted August 21–30, 2007, the CSNPC found an average 0.5 meter residual ranging error and a one-meter sequential error in the MEO satellite’s orbital positions based on comparisons with satellite laser ranging to the satellite. (to see Table 1 and Figure 1, which illustrate this point, download the article pdf above.) The on-board clock error was 5 nanoseconds over 3 hours, and 11 nanoseconds in the course of 24 hours.

Industry on Parade
A well-attended exhibition accompanying the conference drew a couple of dozen Chinese and foreign companies and public agencies. These included the country’s first GNSS company to issue public shares of stock (and the provider of services for the first phase of Beidou), Beijing BDStar Navigation Co., Ltd. Although organizations representing the automotive, portable navigation, and telecom sectors dominated the exhibit, Beijing UniStrong, which plans on entering the U.S. survey market, also was represented.

Underlining the Shanghai region’s generally accepted status as the economic center of China, Chen Kehong, vice-chairman of the Shanghai Municipality’s Science and Technology Commission, described the region’s 14-station differential GPS network.

“In the future, would like to see incorporate multiple [GNSS] systems [into the DGPS network], including Beidou.” Chen said that the regional government would like to see such services based on market rather than planned economy.

“The Shanghai municipal government will move Beidou into the application industry chain,” he added. “We will spare no effort to implement Beidou services and technology development.”

In a corresponding show of bureaucratic support for commercial development, Li Yongxiong, director general of the Department of Map Management, State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping (SBSM), described efforts to liberalize China’s regulatory policies on access to data with which create navigable map databases.

Eleven companies approved by central government to product digital maps with maps currently available from six Chinese companies. These cover every city in China except two, and 95 percent of all of highways, according to Li.

Available mapbases incorporate 5 million points of interest and 1.8 million miles of highways and expressways at 1:10,000 scale. The SBSM is “working very hard on 1:2,000 scale databases in urban areas,” for which the agency would like to create a system to provide real-time updates.

(Articles in future issues of Inside GNSS will return to the subject of China’s domestic GNSS design and manufacturing sector as well as the effect of Compass/Beidou’s development on the world’s other GNSS systems.)

By
December 3, 2007

Measuring Up: Certification Processes and Testing of A-GPS Equipped Cellular Phones

More and more GPS-enabled devices are entering the consumer marketplace, many incorporating assisted-GPS (A-GPS) technology. These include not only cellular phones, but laptop datacards, PDAs, and other mobile equipment.

Increasingly, GPS devices that were previously standalone now incorporate a cellular modem for such applications as mapping download or live traffic alerts. The proliferation of GPS in the consumer space can also be seen in the availability of GPS automotive navigation systems in local supermarkets or large grocery stores.

More and more GPS-enabled devices are entering the consumer marketplace, many incorporating assisted-GPS (A-GPS) technology. These include not only cellular phones, but laptop datacards, PDAs, and other mobile equipment.

Increasingly, GPS devices that were previously standalone now incorporate a cellular modem for such applications as mapping download or live traffic alerts. The proliferation of GPS in the consumer space can also be seen in the availability of GPS automotive navigation systems in local supermarkets or large grocery stores.

Those who purchase these products expect the technology to function everywhere, continuously, be simple to use and to always have the most obscure address in its database.

To help ensure the successful deployment of this concept in cellular devices, the telecommunications industry’s standards and certification bodies have been working diligently on a standardized approach to A-GPS certification.

In recent years, the subject of A-GPS, its purpose, and operation, has gotten a lot of attention in the technical and trade media. The authors of these various sources have focused on either the technical details or on the performance of the technology in the areas for which it was or was not primarily designed.

For example, performance in urban canyons and indoor environments or development and testing by manufacturers, cellular network operators or research organizations of products using this technology.

In contrast, this paper focuses on how a mobile device that incorporates A-GPS technology gains certification for use on a 2G or 3G (GSM or UMTS) cellular network.

(For the rest of this story, please download the complete article using the link above.)

By
IGM_e-news_subscribe