Easy Suite II
easy17—Visualizing Satellite Orbits, easy18—Computing Range and Range Rate Corrections
In the final two installments of the series, the author describes what GPS orbits would look like from various perspectives and explains how to solve for range and range-rate corrections at a GPS base station.
Newcomers often have difficulties imagining what the satellite orbits actually look like.
We say that the constellation consists of some 30 satellites orbiting in six different planes, all making an angle with the Equator of 55 degrees and rotated 60 degrees compared to the previous plane. Figure 1 shows the situation as seen from far away in space, in what we call an inertial frame.
However, things get less clear if the viewer is on the surface of the rotating Earth. How do the trajectories then look?
Very weird is how.
The situation is depicted in Figure 2.
Here we use the so-called Earth Centered Earth Fixed (ECEF) coordinate system. The ECEF system is in a fixed relationship with the rotating Earth. That is, a given physical point on the surface maintains its coordinates over time, except for possible movements of the crust.
Finally, Figure 3 shows a curve made up of the sub-satellite points of an arbitrary part of an orbit.
The curve is the intersection between the surface of the Earth and the line segment between the satellite and the origin. This sub-satellite curve runs within a symmetric belt on both sides of equator and is limited by northern and southern latitudes equal to the inclination angle of the orbit with the equator.
Let ρ denote the geometric distance between the satellite and the receiver antennas, dti denote the receiver clock offset, dtk the satellite clock offset, and T the tropospheric delay. Then the corrected range is computed as
ρ* = ρ + cdti - cdtk + T
and the range correction as
d = ρ* - Pobs.
Figure 4 shows range and range rate corrections over 23 epochs using September 4, 2001, data.
The receiver clock offset pos(4,:) varies between 1.13 × 105 and 1.15 × 105 through the 23-second period of observations.
My thanks also go to Professor Per Enge for several invitations to stay at Stanford University’s Center for Position, Navigation, and Time. I appreciated the wonderful facilities there, and all of the people I encountered. They showed so much kindness and helpfulness, and made my stays comfortable.
Finally I am very grateful to Steve Hilla for his comprehensive help in converting the manuscript from latex into Word.
Copyright © 2017 Gibbons Media & Research LLC, all rights reserved.